Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Subsurface flowpaths in a forested headwater stream harbor a diverse macroinvertebrate community

  • Published:
Wetlands Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Headwater streams and wetlands with a combination of surface and subsurface flows are common features of many upland-forested watersheds. Unlike headwater stream reaches with continuous surface flow, the hydrology and ecology of subsurface stream reaches are poorly studied and not factored into existing wetland legislation. We assessed subsurface habitats and associated biota in a 435-m reach of a first-order, intermittent stream draining a riparian zone dominated by eastern hemlock (Tsuga canadensis) in north central Massachusetts. Stream flow was found only in subsurface flowpaths beneath large boulders and surface root mats over approximately 70% of the total stream length at summer base flow. Temperature, specific conductivity, dissolved oxygen, and dissolved organic carbon concentrations of subsurface water were similar to surface water. Macroinvertebrates were found in subsurface habitats but at a lower abundance and richness per unit area compared to surface habitats. Collectors such as Chironomidae, Polycentropodidae, and Ephemerellidae were generally the most abundant families in both surface and subsurface habitats. Our findings indicate that in some glaciated watersheds, intermittent streams with no visual evidence of surface flow may contain subsurface flowpaths with water chemistry and biota comparable to coupled perennial surface flow reaches. The prevalence and importance of subsurface habitats in some headwater streams may warrant review or revision of existing state and local regulatory definitions of intermittent and headwater streams.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Literature Cited

  • Anderson, S. P., W. E. Dietrich, D. R. Montgomery, R. Torres, M. E. Conrad, and K. Loague. 1997. Subsurface flow paths in a steep, unchanneled catchment. Water Resources Research 33: 2637–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bertin, R. I. 2002. Losses of native plant species from Worcester, Massachusetts. Rhodora 104: 325–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bonada, N., M. Rieradevall, N. Prat, and V. H. Resh. 2006. Benthic macroinvertebrate assemblages and macrohabitat connectivity in Mediterranean-climate streams of northern California. Journal of the North American Benthological Society 25: 32–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boulton, A. J. 2003. Parallels and contrasts in the effects of drought on stream macroinvertebrate assemblages. Freshwater Biology 48: 1173–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bryan, R. B. and J. A. A. Jones. 1997. The significance of soil piping processes: inventory and prospect. Geomorphology 20: 209–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clinton, S. M., N. B. Grimm, and S. G. Fisher. 1996. Response of a hyporheicinvertebrate assemblage to drying disturbance in a desert stream. Journal of the North American Benthological Society 15: 700–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crouch, R. J. 1990. Rates and mechanisms of discontinuous gully erosion in a red brown earth catchment, New South Wales, Australia. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms 15: 277–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • del Rosario, R. B. and V. H. Resh. 2000. Invertebrates in intermittent and perennial streams: is the hyporheic zone a refuge from drying? Journal of the North American Benthological Society 19: 680–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feminella, J. W. 1996. Comparison of benthic macroinvertebrate assemblages in small streams along a gradient of flow permanence. Journal of the North American Benthological Society 15: 651–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Findlay, S. and W. V. Sobczak. 2000. Microbial communities in hyporheic sediments. p. 287–306, In J. B. Jones and P. J. Mulholland (eds.) Streams and Ground Waters. Academic Press, San Diego, CA, USA.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Freeze, R. A. and J. A. Cherry. 1979. Groundwater. Prentice-Hall, Inc., Englewood Cliffs, NJ, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ghodrati, M. and W. A. Jury. 1990. A field study using dyes to characterize preferential flow of water. Soil Science Society of America Journal 54: 1558–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gordon, N. D., T. A. McMahon, and B. L. Finlayson. 1992. Stream Hydrology: An Introduction for Ecologists. Wiley, Chichester, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hill, A. R. and D. J. Lymburner. 1998. Hyporheic zone chemistry and stream-subsurface exchange in two groundwater-fed streams. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 55: 495–506.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hynes, H. B. N. 1970. The Ecology of Running Waters. University of Toronto Press, Toronto, ON, Canada.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jasinska, E. J., B. Knott, and A. J. McComb. 1996. Root mats in ground water: a fauna-rich cave habitat. Journal of the North American Benthological Society 15: 508–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kessell, S. R. 1979. Adaptation and dimorphism in eastern hemlock, Tsuga canadensis (L.) Carr. American Naturalist 113: 333–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lake, P. S. 2000. Disturbance, patchiness, and diversity in streams. Journal of the North American Benthological Society 19: 573–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lowe, W. H. and G. E. Likens. 2005. Moving headwater streams to the head of the class. Bioscience 55: 196–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marshall, M. C. and R. O. Hall. 2004. Hyporheic invertebrates affect N cycling and respiration in stream sediment microcosms. Journal of the North American Benthological Society 23: 416–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection. 2002. Wetlands protection. Code of Massachusetts Regulations Chapter 310, Sections 10, 13, 30. Boston, MA, USA.

  • Merritt, R. W. and K. W. Cummins (eds.). 1996. An introduction to the aquatic insects of North America, third edition. Kendall/ Hunt Publishers, Dubuque, IA, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, J. L. 2003. Where rivers are born: The scientific imperative for defending small streams and wetlands. Washington (DC): American Rivers, Sierra Club.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pepin, D. M. and F. R. Hauer. 2002. Benthic responses to groundwater-surface water exchange in 2 alluvial rivers in northwestern Montana. Journal of the North American Benthological Society 21: 370–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Poole, G. C., J. A. Stanford, S. W. Running, and C. A. Frissell. 2006. Multiscale geomorphic drivers of groundwater flow paths: subsurface hydrologic dynamics and hyporheic habitat diversity. Journal of the North American Benthological Society 25: 288–303.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Price, K., A. Suski, J. McGarvie, B. Beasly, and J. S. Richardson. 2003. Communities of aquatic insects of old-growth and clearcut coastal headwater streams of varying flow persistence. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 33: 1416–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Resh, V. H., A. V. Brown, A. P. Covich, M. E. Gurtz, H. W. Li, G. W. Minshall, S. R. Reice, A. L. Sheldon, J. B. Wallace, and R. Wissmar. 1988. The role of disturbance in stream ecology. Journal of the North American Benthological Society 7: 433–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, R. S. 1978. Forests dominated by hemlock (Tsuga canadensis): distributions as related to site and post settlement history. Canadian Journal of Botany 56: 843–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Semlitsch, R. D. and J. R. Bodie. 2003. Biological criteria for buffer zones around wetlands and riparian habitats for amphibians and reptiles. Conservation Biology 17: 1219–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Snyder, C. D., J. A. Young, D. P. Lemarie, and D. R. Smith. 2002. Influence of eastern hemlock (Tsuga canadensis) forests on aquatic invertebrate assemblages in headwater streams. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 59: 262–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sobczak, W. V. and S. Findlay. 2002. Variation in bioavailability of dissolved organic carbon among stream hyporheic flowpaths. Ecology 83: 3194–3209.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stanford, J. A. and J. V. Ward. 1988. The hyporheic habitat of river ecosystems. Nature 335: 64–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Storey, R. G. and D. D. Williams. 2004. Spatial responses of hyporheic invertebrates to seasonal changes in environmental parameters. Freshwater Biology 49: 1468–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Uchida, T., K. Kosugi, and T. Mizuyama. 1999. Runoff characteristics of pipeflow and effects of pipeflow on rainfallrunoff phenomena in a mountainous watershed. Journal of Hydrology 22: 18–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vannote, R. L., G. W. Minshall, K. W. Cummins, J. R. Sedell, and C. E. Cushing. 1980. The river continuum concept. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 37: 130–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walsh, R. P. D. and K. A. Howells. 1988. Soil pipes and their role in runoff generation and chemical denudation in a humid tropical catchment in Dominica. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms 13: 9–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • White, D. S. 1990. Perspectives on defining and delineating hyporheic zones. Journal of the North American Benthological Society 12: 61–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams, D. D. 1996. Environmental constraints in temporary fresh waters and their consequences for the insect fauna. Journal of the North American Benthological Society 15: 634–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams, D. D. and H. B. N. Hynes. 1974. The occurrence of benthos deep in the substratum of a stream. Freshwater Biology 4: 233–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Biology, College of the Holy Cross, #1 College Street, 01610, Worcester, Massachusetts, USA

    Bridget M. Collins & William V. Sobczak

  2. Harvard Forest, Harvard University, P. O. Box 68, 01366, Petersham, Massachusetts, USA

    Elizabeth A. Colburn

Authors
  1. Bridget M. Collins
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. William V. Sobczak
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Elizabeth A. Colburn
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Collins, B.M., Sobczak, W.V. & Colburn, E.A. Subsurface flowpaths in a forested headwater stream harbor a diverse macroinvertebrate community. Wetlands 27, 319–325 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1672/0277-5212(2007)27[319:SFIAFH]2.0.CO;2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1672/0277-5212(2007)27[319:SFIAFH]2.0.CO;2

Key Words

Search

Navigation